Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Research Articles

INFLUENCE OF OBESITY ON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND REVISION RATES FOLLOWING REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

BackgroundObesity has been linked with increased rates of knee osteoarthritis. Limited information is available on the survival and functional outcome results of rTKR in the obese patients. This registry-based study aimed to identify whether BMI is an independent risk factor for poorer functional outcomes and /or implant survival in rTKA.MethodsNew Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) data of patients who underwent rTKA from 1st January 2010 to January 2023 was performed. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), BMI, Operative time, indications for revision and components revised of the patients undergoing rTKA was collected. Oxford knee score (OKS) at 6 months and rates of second revision (re- revision) were stratified based on standardised BMI categories.ResultsOf the 2687 revisions, functional outcome scores were available for 1261 patients. Oxford knee scores following rTKA are significantly inferior in higher BMI patients (36.5 vs 31.5 p<0.001). This held true when adjusted for age (35.7 vs 30.9 p<0.001).Tibial component loosening was a more common indication for revision in patients with BMI >40 (31.1% vs 21% for BMI <25), whereas periprosthetic femoral fracture was significantly more commonly seen in patients with BMI <25.Re-revision rates displayed no significant differences between any pairs of BMI groups (2.18/100 component years) and adjusting for age and sex did not alter this (p= 0.462). Indications for re-revision were also not different between BMI categories.Over 50% of the rTKA patients were obese. Significantly more obese patients were ASA grade 3,4 and more were <75 years. Operative time was longer in the obese patients (p<0.001).ConclusionsAlthough overall re-revision rates are similar between all BMI categories, the functional outcomes favour those with lower BMI. Patients with higher BMI are younger, more comorbid and carry potentially higher perioperative risks. The registry data provides valuable information when providing counsel to patients undergoing rTKA and lends further support to optimising patients prior to pTKA.

Long-term outcomes of the mayo conservative hip system in patients aged 30years or less with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: mean follow-up of more than 10years.

Historically, total hip arthroplasty (THA) in very young patients has been associated with lower survivorship. However, the long-term outcomes of THA using short stems for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in very young patients remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of the Mayo conservative hip system, a short metaphyseal stabilised stem, in patients with ONFH aged ≦30years. We retrospectively reviewed 104 joints in 76 patients with ONFH who underwent THA using the Mayo conservative hip system with a minimum follow-up of 8years. The mean follow-up period was 12.5 (range, 8-19) years. Patients were categorised into two age groups (≦30years, n = 21 and > 30years, n = 83). Radiographic evaluation was used to assess stem sinking, stress shielding, and spot welds. The clinical evaluations were performed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score. Postoperative major complication and revision surgery rates were also assessed. The patient characteristics were similar between the two groups, except for the age. Revision surgeries were performed in five cases, with similar implant survival rates between the groups. Dislocations occurred in the older age group alone (four joints). One case of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fracture was found in the younger age group. Stem sinking of > 3mm occurred in one and seven joints in the younger and older age groups, respectively. Spot welds were observed in most joints (93.2%) in modified Gruen zones 2 and 6 without significant differences between the groups. Stress shielding showed no significant differences in the frequency of occurrence or location between the two groups. Furthermore,the JOA score showed no significant difference between the two groups. The use of short stems in patients aged ≤ 30years with ONFH showed favourable long-term outcomes.

PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE RATES FOLLOWING THE USE OF DUAL-MOBILITY ACETABULAR COMPONENTS

The increased torque required to dislocate dual mobility (DM) components may increase peri-prosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) risk. Current literature often relies on revision as an endpoint and may underestimate PPF. This study aims to review PPF rate, risks and treatment following primary DM implantation.Prospective cohort study of 549 patients following primary DM total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2013 and 2021. Collected data included demographics, indication for surgery, cortical index and PPF.549 patients were identified with primary DM THA. Mean age was 73 years (26–96). 446 (81.2%) patients had their index surgery following hip fracture. 18 patients (3.27%) sustained a PPF. Cumulative PPF rate was 1.5% at 1-year, 2.2% at 5-years and 3.27% overall. PPF was higher in patients undergoing surgery following hip fracture (4%) vs. other indications (1%). OR 4.04 (95% CI:0.53, 30.72), p=0.219. Mean cortical index was lower in patients with PPF 0.4 (95% CI:0.36, 0.45) compared to those without 0.46 (95% CI:0.45, 0.46) p=0.029. Treatment for PPF included 10 (55.6%) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), 7 (38.9%) revision THA and 1 conservatively managed.PPF rate following DM use is higher in our cohort than published rates. Our rates are comparable to some papers when subgroup analysis of older patients and cemented taper slip stems are considered. PPF risk with DM may be increased in patients undergoing surgery after hip fracture or with a lower cortical index preoperatively. Over half of PPF were managed with ORIF and may mask PPF risk studies that report using revision as an endpoint.

ESTIMATING THE RISK OF POSTOPERATIVE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ASSOCIATED WITH COMMONLY USED IMPLANTS: AN ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL HEALTH DATA FROM ENGLAND

Current estimates of periprosthetic fracture risk associated with femoral implants is mostly limited to revision only estimates and does not accurately represent stem performance. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of surgically treated post-operative periprosthetic femoral fracture (POPFF) more accurately associated with frequently used femoral implants used for total hip arthroplasty (THA).A cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. Periprosthetic fractures were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national procedure coding records. Survival modelling was used to estimate POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients over 70 years, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and neck of femur fracture.POPFF occurred in 0.6% (5100/809,832) of cases during a median (IQR) follow up of 6.5 (3.9 to 9.6) years. The majority of POPFF were treated with fixation after implantation of a cemented stem. Adjusted patient time incidence rates (PTIR) for POPFF varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam stems (CB stems) demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF versus the current gold standard polished taper slip cemented stem.POPFF account for a quarter of all revisions following primary THA. Cemented CB stems are associated with the lowest POPFF risk. Stem design is strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when recommending femoral implants in those most at risk of POPFF.

DOES AN INTRAOPERATIVE FEMORAL FRACTURE IMPACT ONE-YEAR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES WHEN USING A CEMENTLESS CORAIL STEM?

The significance of periprosthetic fractures about a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming increasingly important. Recent studies have demonstrated post-operative periprosthetic fracture rates are higher amongst cemented polished taper slip (PTS) stem designs compared to collared cementless (CC) designs.However, in the National Joint Registry, the rate of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFF) with cementless implant systems remains higher (0.87% vs 0.42%. p <0.001) potentially leading to more post-operative complications.This study identifies the incidence of IOPFF, the fracture subtype and compares functional outcomes and revision rates of CC femoral implants with an IOPFF to CC stems and PTS stems without a fracture.5376 consecutive CC stem THA, carried out through a posterior approach were reviewed for IOPFF. Each fracture was subdivided into calcar fracture, greater trochanter (GT) fracture or shaft fracture.1:1:1 matched analysis was carried out to compare Oxford scores at one year. Matching criteria included; sex (exact), age (± 1 year), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade (exact), and date of surgery (± 6 months).Electronic records were used to review revision rates.Following review of the CC stems, 44 (0.8%) were identified as having an IOPFF. Of these 30 (0.6%) were calcar fractures, 11 (0.2%) GT fractures and 3 (0.06%) were shaft fractures. There were no shaft penetrations.Overall, no significant difference in Oxford scores at one year were observed when comparing the CC IOPFF, CC non-IOPFF and PTS groups.There were no CC stems revised for any reason with either a calcar fracture or trochanteric fracture within the period of 8 years follow-up.IOPFF do occur more frequently in cementless systems than cemented. The majority are calcar and GT fractures. These fractures, when identified and managed intra-operatively, do not have worse functional outcomes or revision rates compared to matched non-IOPFF cases.

Collared Cementless Femoral Components Reduce the Revision Rates in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study

BackgroundAn increased risk of periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening is reported when the direct anterior approach (DAA) is used for total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially with cementless implants. We assessed the rate of revision comparing collared and collarless femoral stems when using the DAA for THA. MethodsWe used data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) for primary THA for osteoarthritis inserted with the DAA between January 2015 and December 2022. There were 48,567 THAs that used the DAA (26,690 collarless cementless, 10,161 collared cementless, and 11,716 cemented). Cumulative percent revision (CPR) was calculated for all-cause revision, revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures, and aseptic femoral stem loosening. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare the revision of collared and collarless cementless stems. We also compared collared cementless stems and cemented stems. ResultsA higher rate of all-cause revision within three months of surgery was observed with collarless compared to collared cementless implants (HR [hazard ratio]: 1.99 [95% CI (confidence interval), 1.56 to 2.54]; P < 0.001). Similarly, collarless cementless implants were associated with a greater rate of revision for fracture in the first six months (HR: 2.90 [95% CI, 1.89 to 4.45]; P < 0.001) and after 6 months (HR 10.04 [95% CI 1.38 to 73.21]; P = 0.02), as well as an increased rate of revision for aseptic loosening after two years (HR: 5.76 [95% CI, 1.81 to 18.28], P = 0.003). Collared cementless and cemented stems performed similarly. ConclusionCollared stems were associated with a reduced rate of all-cause revision for cementless THA performed via the DAA. The reduction in risk may be due to protection from periprosthetic femoral fracture and aseptic loosening.

The burden of periprosthetic femoral fractures in England and Wales: insights from the first two years of data collection in the National Hip Fracture Database and regional variation in care

IntroductionPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs) represent an important healthcare problem, with a rising incidence noted due to an increase in the number of arthroplasty surgeries being performed. There is a current lack of national consensus as to how these complex, often frail patients are managed. AimsOur primary aim was to present the epidemiology of PPFFs in England and Wales over the first two years of data collection by the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Secondary aims included how well the NHFD Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are met for PPFF patients, whether centres reporting a higher burden of PPFF patients are more likely to meet KPIs compared to lower volume centres, and to also identify if regional variation in care for these patients exist. MethodsPatients aged 60 years or over, admitted to any acute hospital in England or Wales with a PPFF within the period 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2021 were included. Fractures were classified using the Vancouver system. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of PPFF in England and Wales. Secondary outcomes included i) geographical distribution, ii) pattern of injury, iii) treatment received, iv) KPI performance nationally, v) KPI performance by top 5 highest volume hospitals vs the rest, vi) KPI performance by region and vii) KPI performance compared with native hip fracture patients. ResultsA total of 5,566 PPFFs were reported during our study period. A 31% increase in cases was seen between 2020 and 2021 (2,405 to 3,161). The South-West of England reported the highest burden of PPFFs (14% of all cases reported in 2021). Vancouver B subtypes were most common around hip replacements (62%) and C subtype around knee replacements (55%). A total of 4,598 patients (82.6%) underwent operative management. There was regional variation in KPI attainment. When compared to KPI attainment for native hip fractures PPFF care under performed in most regions and domains. High volume PPFF centres were not associated with improved attainment of KPIs. ConclusionWe have described the incidence, nature, and management of PPFF at national and regional levels using routinely collected NHFD data. Both numerically and due to case complexity, PPFF are a considerable challenge to patients and health services alike. This epidemiology is not captured by other existing datasets and increased case contribution to the NHFD is encouraged to improve understanding and enable prioritisation and delivery of further care and research.

Effects of Cerclage Cabling on Preventing Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures When Using Cementless Stems for Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are serious complications in hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The rates of intraoperative and postoperative PFFs are higher in cementless stem cases than in cemented cases. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cerclage cabling on PFF prevention in cementless arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. MethodsThis retrospective study included 329 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroplasty using a cementless stem for femoral neck fractures. A total of 159 and 170 patients were in the non-cabling and cabling groups, respectively. Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. The PFF occurrence (intraoperative PFF [iPFF] and postoperative PFF [pPFF]) rates, reoperation rates, operative time, and blood loss volume were compared between the groups. ResultsThe iPFF rate was significantly higher in the non-cabling group (6.3%) than in the cabling group (0%, P < 0.001). The rate of pPFF was significantly higher in the non-cabling group (5.1%) than in the cabling group (0.6%; P = 0.016). All patients in the non-cabling group required reoperation (5.1%), whereas the patient in the cabling group was an ambulatory case and required no reoperation (0%, P = 0.003). No significant difference in either operative time or blood loss volume was observed between the non-cabling (50 minutes, 133 mL) and cabling (52 minutes, P = 0.244; 149 mL, P = 0.212, respectively) groups. ConclusionWhen a cementless stem is used to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, cerclage cabling effectively prevents iPPF and pPPF without increasing surgical time or blood loss volume.

Floating total knee: periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur combined with tibial plateau fracture in primary total knee arthroplasty

We are currently witnessing an increasing number of complications associated with arthroplasty, both due to its greater prevalence, whether primary or revision, and to the population's longer average life expectancy. Periprosthetic fractures associated with a floating knee, in the context of total knee arthroplasty, are rare and their treatment is challenging. We present a case of ipsilateral periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur combined with fracture of the tibial plate in total knee arthroplasty. The 80-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency department after falling from her own height at home. She reported diffuse pain in her right knee and associated functional incapacity. The limb was stabilized and immobilized in a posterior long leg splint. Initial X-rays showed an ipsilateral periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur and medial tibial plate. The patient's only previous surgery was a total right knee arthroplasty performed in 2020. She underwent surgical treatment with osteosynthesis of the distal femur with a locked anatomical plate and arthroplasty revision of the tibial component. Periprosthetic fractures associated with knee arthroplasty typically involve the distal femur. Fractures involving the tibia are rare and usually occur in the medial tibial plate, in the presence of detachment of the tibial component. There is little published literature on this type of fracture in elderly patients. Periprosthetic fractures in total knee arthroplasty require individualized and planned treatment according to the personality of each fracture and the existence or not of prosthetic detachment.

Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFs) around the hip are challenging complications in orthopaedic surgery, particularly Vancouver type B2 (VTB2) fractures. The surgical management of these fractures is crucial and depends on various factors. Cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis is an alternative surgical technique. This study aims to compare the outcomes of this surgical technique with revision arthroplasty (RA) with long stem in the treatment of VTB2 PPFs. This retrospective study was conducted in a single medical institute from February 2010 to May 2019. Patients who had received either total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty and subsequently developed a VTB2 PPF were included; patients who sustained intra-operative fractures or received a cemented stem previously were excluded from the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups: group I received RA with cementless long stem, while group II underwent RA with cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis. Demographic data, radiographic and functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed between the two groups. A total of 85 patients diagnosed with VTB2 PPFs were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data, including age, gender, mean follow-up times, estimated blood loss, and operative times. The radiographic results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of subsidence and implant stability between the two groups. However, group II tended to have less subsidence and periprosthetic osteolysis. Patients in group II had significantly better functional scores (mean Harris hip score: post-operative: 60.2 in group I and 66.7 in group ii; last follow-up: 77.4 in group 1 and 83.2 in group II (both p < 0.05)). There were no significant differences in the overall complication rate, including infection, dislocation, re-fracture, and revision surgery, between the two groups. Both surgical techniques, cementless long stem and cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis, are effective in the treatment of Vancouver B2 PPFs, with no significant differences in outcomes or complications. However, patients in cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis had better functional scores at both post-operative and the last follow-up.

Distal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures around a total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Periprosthetic fracture is a rare complication of arthroplasty but can have devastating consequences for the patient and presents a complex surgical challenge. Locking compression plate and retrograde intramedullary nail are both widely accepted surgical fixation techniques for distal femoral periprosthetic fractures around a total knee arthroplasty. Although there is still a need for further high-quality research into both techniques, there is even less literature concerning the use of distal femoral replacement to treat distal femoral periprosthetic fractures. Interest has been piqued in distal femoral replacements for the treatment of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures due to the theoretical advantages of immediate post-operative weight-bearing and lack of dependence on fracture union, but there are still understandably reservations about performing such an extensive and invasive procedure when an accepted alternative is available. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the current literature to compare the complication rates and return to pre-operative ambulatory status of distal femoral replacement and locking compression plate. A literature search was performed to identify articles related to the management of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures around a total knee arthroplasty in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Methodological quality was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria. Articles were reviewed, and data extracted for analysis. Five articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 345 periprosthetic fractures. The overall rates of complications for distal femoral replacement and locking compression plate were: re-operation (6.1% vs 12.1%), infection (3.0% vs 5.3%), mortality (19.7% vs 19.3%), and return to pre-operative ambulatory status (60.9% vs 71.8%) (respectively). This meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference in the rates of re-operation, infection, mortality or return to pre-operative ambulatory status when comparing distal femoral replacement to locking compression plate.

What’s New in Periprosthetic Femur Fractures?

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is one of the most common indications for reoperation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This article provides a review of a symposium on PFF that was presented at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) 2023 annual meeting, including an overview of the Vancouver classification and its implications on treatment and subsequent complications, an updated approach to the management of intraoperative fractures, and finally, contemporary strategies for both osteosynthesis as well as revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femur fractures.

Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the occurrence of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Methods: The researchers conducted a retrospective review of 447 patients (494 hips) who received a hip replacement with an ESOP stem. The average follow-up period was 12.33 ± 5.2 years. The study population comprised 248 men with 276 hips and 203 women with 220 hips, with a mean age of 65.7 ± 11.6 years. Results: We found 42 PPFs, 15 of them taking place intraoperatively. Regarding the postoperative fractures, 3 of them happened during the first month and the rest of them afterward. There were 3 deaths directly related to the PPF episode. We found a higher risk of fractures among the female, population older than 65 years, and among those with total hip arthroplasty following hip fracture. This population showed a higher incidence of complications and mortality rate. The cumulative percentage probability of periprosthetic femoral fracture was 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2-5.6) at 10 years, and 10.3% (95% confidence interval, 7-20) at 20 years after surgery. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that periprosthetic femoral fracture incidence increases significantly after the first decade. The use of modular stems did not modify this behavior, similar to other nonmodular or anatomical stems.

Traumatic Floating Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

A 58-year-old woman with medical history of a left total hip arthroplasty performed by the direct anterior (DA) approach 2 years prior presented with left hip pain. She was found to have sustained a transverse Vancouver C periprosthetic femur fracture and an unstable periprosthetic pelvic fracture. This patient's case represents a previously not reported injury about a total hip arthroplasty-with disruption distal to the femoral implant and proximal to the acetabular implant, with the implant-to-bone interface unaffected. This case may guide future treatment of similar injuries.

Finite element analysis of the stability of retrograde intramedullary nail and plate-screw combinations for periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee replacement.

Periprosthetic fractures following total knee replacement are rare but challenging. The goal of the treatment is to achieve the most stable fixation that allows early mobilization. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical results of the use of different fixation systems in the treatment of distal femur periprosthetic fractures with finite element analysis. A total knee prosthesis was implanted in Sawbone femur models. A transverse fracture line was created in the supracondylar region and was fixed in four different groups. In group 1, fracture line fixation was fixed using retrograde intramedullary nailing. In group 2, fixation was applied using a lateral anatomic distal femoral. In group 3, in addition to the fixation made in group 1, a lateral anatomic distal femoral plate was used. In group 4, in addition to the fixation made in group 2, a 3.5 mm Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate (LC-DCP) was applied medially. Computed Tomography (CT) scans were taken of the created models and were converted to three-dimensional models. Axial and rotational loading forces were applied to all the created models. The least deformation with axial loading was observed in the double plate group. Group 3 was determined to be more advantageous against rotational forces. The greatest movement in the fracture line was found in group 2. The application of the medial plate was determined to reduce the tension on the lateral plate and increase stability in the fracture line. Combining a lateral anatomic plate with intramedullary nailing or a medial plate was seen to be biomechanically more advantageous than using a lateral plate or intramedullary nailing alone in the treatment of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Atypical Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur in the United Kingdom: a case report challenged by myeloma, osteoporosis, infection, and recurrent implant failures

The indications for total hip replacement are increasing and not limited to osteoarthritis. Total hip replacement may also be done for trauma and pathological fractures in patients otherwise physiologically fit and active. This trend has led to an inevitable rise in complications such as periprosthetic femoral fracture. Periprosthetic femoral fracture can be challenging due to poor bone quality, osteoporosis, and stress fractures. We present a case of periprosthetic femoral fracture in a 71-year-old woman with some components of an atypical femoral fracture. The fracture was internally fixed but was subsequently complicated by infection, implant failure needing revision, and later stress fracture. She was on a bisphosphonate after her index total hip replacement surgery for an impending pathological left proximal femur fracture, and this may have caused the later stress fracture. Unfortunately, she then experienced implant breakage (nonunion), which was treated with a biplanar locking plate and bone grafting. The patient finally regained her premorbid mobility 13 months after the last surgery and progressed satisfactorily towards bony union.

Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) after revision arthroplasty following periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 in geriatric trauma patients

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine the outcome parameters of revision arthroplasties for periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) with a particular attention to quality of life (QoL) and mobility.Materials and methodsRetrospective single-center study of PPFF with loose implants that underwent revision arthroplasty. Depending on individual patient characteristics, either an uncemented or cemented revision stem was chosen. Data collection included demographics, complications, clinical course and outcome parameters. Follow-up took place at least one year postoperatively.ResultsBetween 2008 and 2016, 43 patients could be included. Most patients (63%) were able to walk independently or with a walking aid after one year and amongst the surveyed patients 77% were able to reside at home. Concerning the QoL assessment, a high index of 0.8 ± 0.1 has been reached after one year. Mortality pointed out to be 9% after one year and 28% in general.ConclusionThe treatment of PPFF remains challenging. Although complication rates and mortality are high in this frail collective of geriatric patients, revision arthroplasty leads to good postoperative results regarding mobility and quality of life.

Permissive Weight Bearing in Patients With Surgically Treated Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Around Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) around total hip arthroplasty (THA) are one of the leading causes of hip revision. High mortality rates are observed after revision in case of PPFF around THA. To modify risk factors, early postoperative mobilization is necessary. Permissive weight bearing (PWB) is designed to optimize clinical recovery in aftercare. This study aimed to perform a scoping review to summarize the current available evidence on postoperative weight bearing in late PPFF around THA and the implementation of PWB in aftercare. A systematic search was performed on the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases on January 26th, 2023. Articles were screened in two stages by two independent reviewers. Studies describing adult patients with a history of primary THA who were surgically treated for late PPFF and mentioning prescribed postoperative weight-bearing protocols with relevant outcome measures were included. Seven studies were included, reporting data on 22 patients (age range 47-97 years, BMI range 19-32 kg/m2, ASA classification range 2-3). No studies used PWB in aftercare. The non-weight-bearing group showed no complications. The restricted weight-bearing group had one death and one implant failure. The full weight-bearing group experienced one deep infection and one plate removal because of impingement. The main finding was that, after an extensive systematic search, no articles could be included focusing on PWB in patients with a late PPFF after THA. Addressing this gap in the literature is essential to advancing the understanding of postoperative weight-bearing protocols and PWB for late PPFF around THA.

Fixation techniques for periprosthetic femur fractures around total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Fixation techniques for periprosthetic femur fractures around total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Periprosthetic fracture following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: is a cemented stem protective?

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) carry significant morbidity following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF). This study assessed fracture complications following arthroplasty for FNF and the effect of cement fixation of the femoral component on intraoperative and post-operative PFF. Between February 2014 and September 2021, 740 patients with a FNF who underwent arthroplasty were analyzed for demographics, surgical management, use of cement for fixation of the femoral component, and subsequent PFF. Variables were compared with Mann-Whitney or Chi-square as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess independent risk factors associated with intraoperative or post-operative PFF. There were 163 THAs (41% cemented) and 577 HAs (95% cemented). There were 28 PFFs (3.8%): 18 post-operative and 10 intraoperative. Fewer post-operative PFFs occurred with cemented stems (1.63% vs. 6.30%, p = 0.002). Mean time from surgery to presentation with post-operative PFF was 14months (0-45months). Mean follow-up time was 10.3months (range: 0-75.7months). In multivariate regression, use of cement and THA was independently associated with decreased post-operative PFF (cement: OR 0.112, 95% CI 0.036-0.352, p < 0.001 and THA: OR 0.249, 95% CI 0.064-0.961, p = 0.044). More intraoperative fractures occurred during THA (3.68% vs. 0.69%, p = 0.004) and non-cemented procedures (5.51% vs. 0.49%, p < 0.001). In multivariate regression, use of cement was protective against intraoperative fracture (OR 0.100, CI 0.017-0.571, p = 0.010). In patients with a FNF treated with arthroplasty, cementing the femoral component is associated with a lower risk of intraoperative and post-operative PFF. Choice of procedure may be based on patient factors and surgeon preference.